a little bit of info

very few links, ads or interruptions, just the writing,
requires an attention span longer than a dog's nose and there's a place at the end to complain.

Saturday, January 30, 2010

Hats Talk

When I was still a young man, I realized that I would go bald.  My father was bald, my mother, sparse.  My father’s father, a cue ball.  My oldest brother, ten years my senior, was hairless by the time he was thirty.

I liked my hair but I was going to lose it.  Not that I had much choice, but I decided to embrace it.  That was made easier when I realized that the most important women in my life all loved bald men.  

My hairline began to recede in my early twenties, right on schedule. By the time I was twenty six my hair was half gone.  I bought a pair of electric clippers and learned to cut what was left as deftly as a barber.  No more appointments for me.  I washed it with bar soap.  Later, on the advice of a dermatologist, I switched to a mild dish detergent.  I don’t think it made a difference to my scalp, but it was cheap enough; a single two dollar bottle lasts almost two years.  When it’s shorn close, the wind caused by stepping out of the shower blows it dry.  

Baldness is a cinch.  To me, a man without hair looks just right, while a man with hair looks odd, almost artificial.  I’m not passing judgment, just saying, a head of hair on a man over fifty makes me laugh.  Sorry guys, your hair is lovely, but I feel for you: cut, color, comb, what a pain in the neck.  I’m not surprised that more people don’t shave their heads, but not having hair was a pleasant surprise, and is a genuine pleasure.

Still, despite acceptance, baldness comes with a few minor insecurities.  Do I look older than I feel?  Does my wife like my baldness as much as I do?  How about women who’ve never met me?  Is the skin on my scalp healthy and attractive? Do I have a pleasant shaped head?  What about corners or points?  How about bumps?  But easily the worst thing, in fact, the only drawback exclusive to being bald and what occasionally makes me wish I had hair is cold weather.  

I knew this problem was coming because I had all those role models.   So being a former boy scout who likes to be prepared (yes, I wore one of those vintage boy scout hats that are pointed at each end and come to a peak), I started wearing hats long before I lost my hair.  It gets cold in New England.  I bought no-names and brand names: Stetsons, Kangols, Capas, and every style I could lay my hands on.   I wore dress hats, cowboy hats, fedoras, caps, crushers, outback hats, skullcaps, headscarves, do-rags and stocking caps.  They were cotton, felt, wool, leather, linen, canvas and hemp.  Anything.  Everything.   Hats from Russia, India, Nepal, Pakistan, Europe, Africa, North America, South America, anywhere, everywhere.  Almost.  

Of course, if you know me, you know where this is going.  No hat was right.  None of them felt like hair.  I was always aware of having a particular one on and they each made a statement that I didn’t want to make.   Embarrassing or serious or funny.   Take baseball caps for example.  If you wear one everyday, after a while it becomes part of your persona.  I couldn’t be so casual, so acceptable, so ordinary.   I wanted people to look at me and form an opinion, even a bad one.  I couldn’t be just another guy in a baseball cap.  Every other hat seemed to have its own personality too, and after trying each one out, I decided I didn’t like it.  This went on for years, so I gave up a lot of hats.  Some I wore for a while, some just for a day, or a week.  Some I wore until they fell apart, but not too many.  Of course I still have some because they are special or perfect for a particular job or event.  On the coldest days I still wear a nice thick stretchy wool hat that pulls way down over my ears.  In the brightest summer sunlight I like a broad brim that keeps the rays off my head and neck.  I can picture myself in Mexico, sleeping against a whitewashed wall, white cotton everything, droopy straw hat and three-day’s growth of beard and mustache.  What a hat that would be!  Under my bicycle helmet I wear a red headscarf, scorpion adorned, and to a funeral I will often wear either a black or a gray fedora with a black hat band.  Hats talk.

Probably because I like being bald, I didn’t realize how much I wanted a main hat, a hair substitute.  One brilliant, sunny day on Cape Cod, my wife and I were walking around the Wellfleet flea market with our kids.  I was about thirty.  My hat obsession was well into its seventh year.  As usual, we were looking over the hat table and to my shock and dismay she picked up a beret and handed it to me.  I shook my head and put it down, not a beret, I had ruled them out a while ago, I had a navy blue one at home in my closet.  I circled around the table a couple of times and then went back to it.  I picked it up again, showed it to her as if she hadn’t already given me her opinion, hoping she would say no, I even gave her my sad eyes, but she nodded.  Yes, she said.  Try it on.  

You have to understand, not only was this a beret, something I considered too French and effeminate, but this particular beret was red, --no, gorgeously, unashamedly, magnificently, in-your-face red.  How could I wear that?  I looked around, hung my head a little, saw that no one was paying any attention and slipped it on.  I adjusted it with a little twist of the wrist, tipped it jauntily down toward my right ear and then was distracted by my kids.  As you might know, kids in a flea market require a lot of attention, especially toddlers, so I did my job and that’s when the miracle happened.   

I forgot that I was wearing the hat.  Literally forgot.   No one had noticed me put it on and when I walked away from the table, chasing after my kids, no one hollered.  No one asked me for money, my kids didn’t say anything, my wife was otherwise occupied and I was wearing a completely comfortable, apparently invisible, bright red stolen beret.  Eventually I remembered that it was on my head, realized how natural it felt there and found the vendor and paid him his asking price.  Usually I dicker at the flea market, but the hat was two dollars.  Yup, I found my hair replacement and it cost me two dollars.  I’ve been wearing it ever since.   Little babies love it.  It catches their eye; I’m the only man they know with truly red hair.  As for adults, other men probably hate it, but they admire the chutzpah that it takes to wear it and much to my delight, women know a man when they see one in any color hat, but especially in a red one.

Finally, the first one wore out, and I’ve had to spend a little more since then, but I bought one for five dollars from a street vendor in New York about eight years ago.  Sometime in between I bought one from a retail-clothing store.  It was in the women’s section.  There might have been one other, but I think that’s it.  Twenty five years, maybe twenty bucks, four actual hats and I still have two of them, which is what prompted me to write about this in the first place.  I have two of them and they are different.

One is a little smaller than the other and a little lighter, they’re both definitely red, but you know how color is, the slightest variation stands one out against the other.  I prefer the smaller one.  I like its slightly faded color, its barely wider band, its thicker little nub at the top, they’re like your hair’s characteristics, untamed cowlick, left flip on the right side, widow’s peak, gray roots, but no one else even knows that I have two, that there’s a difference, and that it matters to me which one I’m wearing.  I don’t think my wife knows the difference, or if she does, it makes no difference to her.  But these hats are my hair, I know how each looks and feels, and I prefer to wear my hat just so.  I tease people with hair about vanity, but obviously I’m vain too, it’s just that I can take my vanity off or put it on at will and no one suspects a thing.


Today I washed them both and laid them out flat.   See, look at these.  Different hats.  I probably won’t wash them again for a year.  Right now I have to wait for them to dry.  In the meantime, I’ll be bald.







Wednesday, January 20, 2010

Brown Study






I thought about voting for Scott Brown.  I wouldn't say that I came close to voting for him, but I considered the idea without horror, so I think I understand why so many people did.  Oddly enough, it is one of the same reasons I voted for Obama; I am not happy with the status quo.

In the Massachusetts senate race the choices, profoundly divergent, were also profoundly limited.  After Alan Khazei, a truly independent voice was eliminated in the primary, we were left with either Coakley, a cipher of the Democrats, or Brown, a Sarah Palin Republican with wit and brains.  Martha, the status quo, or Scott, the attractive symbol of change.  In Massachusetts we like to think of ourselves as being leaders in the fray, keepers of the keys to liberty, wise in the ways of politics, a place for the nation to look when it has lost its way.  We have relished being the birthplace of the Adamses, the abolitionists, the Kennedys, a lone voice against Nixon, a strong arm in the election of Barack Obama.  So why did we elect a right wing conservative?  Change.

After eight wearying years of George Bush during which even staunch Republicans became disillusioned, we needed change.  We were tired of being a rogue nation on the world stage that would sooner die than reach accord on inconvenient ideas like climate change in which we could be singled out as one of the chief offenders.  We were tired of Bush's secrecy, his unlimited spending in a cause we never fully understood or supported, his continued assault on privacy and his imperious disregard of international conventions and the laws of our own land.  We were tired of his handling of the economy, our houses becoming worth less and we were angry that our banks and bankers were acting like rich, spoiled brats with no parental discipline.  We needed change.

Obama promised change and we embraced him with both arms.   Daddy, welcome home.  Father Abraham, where have you been?  Conservatives and liberals slapped each other's backs and gloried in our stand against racism, our historic venture into the vast potential of a post-racial landscape.  Look, world, we are Americans, there is no place like this anywhere else on the planet.  It was a prideful moment, but as pride often has a way of doing, it blinded us to our own motives.  We were looking for Abraham Lincoln when we would have been better off with Franklin Roosevelt.  Although it is still possible, change is a tricky master and Obama has not yet figured out how to lead it.  

That is no more evident than in Massachusetts where there is already a universal state health insurance plan signed into law by a Republican, where banks have not failed, where unemployment is under 10% and declining, where, until last night, not a single Republican graced its congressional delegation.   Despite all of the apparent good news here, people still want change.  I want change, I can feel it deep and inarticulate burning within me.  The Obama revolution, which promised to speak it, is still burning inside me without a voice.   So I asked myself, what change do I want?  Is Scott Brown going to bring the change I want?  My answer was no, so I voted for Coakley because her party's positions are more closely aligned with my own.  But far many more people, independents like me, said yes.

Yes, they said, we want change.  We don't like the way that our politicians behave.  In Massachusetts we have seen the results when a single party controls it all.  We have watched politics as usual become corruption as usual.  We know what the party can do when the party is the only party.  In Massachusetts, you are either a party member or you are on the outside.  Outside your own government.  There is no dialogue, no loyal opposition, no consideration or deliberation.  It's a lot like George Bush's government all over again; you're either with us or against us.  Martha Coakley embodied that and she took it for granted that that was enough to win the election.  In fact as she began to lose control, a control she never really had, and all of the national Democrats came pouring into the state to rescue her from herself, the Republicans came here for the opposite reason.  They came to ride the wave behind a man who stood up on his surfboard, bronze and tan in the Massachusetts winter and said that he was the new voice of change.

Sadly, people believed him.  Gridlock will go on.  Incivility will continue to fester.  Money will continue to rule.  Perhaps now even more than ever.  Scott Brown is the color of the day, another change in shoes who will no doubt become a part of the business as usual machine.  Scott Brown is not a voice for change because neither the Republicans nor the Democrats can be the voice of change.  They are just different sides of the same old coin.